Skip to main content

Literature Review: Find literature review materials

Searching comprehensively

Your literature review should be as comprehensive as possible -- you want to include all of the relevant resources dealing with your topic. Missing important articles or researchers will significantly weaken your scholarship! So, searching comprehensively becomes important.

To ensuring comprehensiveness:

  • Identify the databases that will cover your topic
    • Spend some time reading the descriptions of the databases in your subject area
    • Contact the Library to get advice from a librarian on appropriate databases
    • Some topics cross over subject/theoretical boundaries, and librarians can suggest databases that you may not have considered
  • Search in more than one database
    • Some of our databases are huge, containing thousands of journals, but no single database covers every journal relevant to a topic
    • Searching in each relevant database, one at a time, gives you a better sense of control over your search, as well as a more accurate idea of the journals/databases that you've covered

Using a multi-database search (such as Thoreau) is not necessarily recommended; in doing so, you lose the ability to use subject terms and search limits that may be unique to each database.

  • Explore resources outside of the databases:
    • Government websites
    • Professional organizations
    • Research groups
    • Think tanks

These can all be important sources of statistics and reliable information. These will not be peer-reviewed resources (i.e. since they are not journals, they do not employ the same sort of editorial process that results in peer-review). Evaluating for reliability is important!

Beyond the Library: Google Scholar

Google Scholar provides a good way to take your search beyond the databases; it searches very broadly and will pull in resources you may not have discovered before.

Google's definition of scholarly includes government sites, think tanks, research organizations, journal websites, and of course  colleges and universities.  

Unfortunately, there is no way to limit your Google Scholar search to only peer-reviewed resources -- so, you will need to invest time and skill in evaluating the resource, before deciding if it's something that can be included.  

Learn more with our Google Scholar guide.

Scholarly/peer-reviewed resources

The standards for scholarly rigor set in the rubric require you to focus your research in the scholarly (i.e. peer-reviewed) journals, most of which are found in our research databases. Discover databases in your field of study on our Articles by Topic page.

Being able to verify that a resource is peer-reviewed is very important as it helps to show you are meeting scholarly rigor.

The most reliable way is to verify peer-review is to look up the journal in Ulrich's Periodical's Directory

Ulrich's can tell you, authoritatively, if the journal follows a peer-reviewed (or "refereed") editorial process.

Simply search for the journal's title on Ulrich's search page, and then find your journal in the list of results.  If the referee jersey icon is shown, then the journal is refereed!  

Screenshot

 

 

 

Ulrich's also contains other information about journals, such as where they are published, names of the editorial staff, etc.

Finding other dissertations/doctoral studies

Finding dissertations and doctoral studies can be useful. While these are not peer-reviewed resources, they are valuable sources of information and citations that can inform your own work.

Literature review process

The literature review process is an iterative one.  In this process you will:

  1. Choose a topic.
  2. Search for current literature on the topic.
  3. Evaluate the literature you find.
  4. Search for more literature, using what you learned in the evaluation step to inform your search.
  5. Once you have exhausted the literature, synthesize and summarize it.

 

For more information

See these guides for more on these topics:

  • Find Full Text
    Last Updated Oct 31, 2018 349 views this year